Since I bought my iPhone 4 with its great camera, my Canon S90 has fallen into oblivion. Although you can’t compare them, the results in favorable lighting conditions are quite similar and many times it’s just not worth it to carry the S90. In poor lighting conditions the Canon S90 still kicks iPhone’s ass thanks to its F2.0 lens and its low noise when using high ISOs.
Almost all the following photos are taken using my iPhone 4. But among them there are 5 photos that were taken with my Canon S90, can you guess which 5 are they?
6 replies on “Canon S90 or iPhone 4”
Are you going to post which pics are not take with the iPhone?
“Although you can’t compare them, the results in favorable lighting conditions are quite similar”….
You’re kidding, right?, I mean, everybody knows you’re an ultra fan of Apple, but, c’mon, similar!!!???. If you resize the pictures for web, ok, I agree, but if you compare the source images of both cameras, or use it for a printing media ( without applying to both a hundred lomo and toy camera effects ) the iphone it’s not even close in quality by far!!. I mean, it’s easier to go around taking pictures with the iphone, I agree with that, but saying such a moronic statement as “are quite similar” doesn’t make it true, not even for an Apple fanboy.
I would agree with Abelardo.
Anything with 3 megapixels will produce an acceptable image for a web site.
The file gets cropped, tweaked, resized, compressed and finally displayed on someone else’s monitor with any kind of settings.
2, 3, 13, 14, 15 were taken with the s90 🙂
[…] gibt es eine Menge Grautöne. Sag mal auf einen Blick, welche Fotos mit der S90 gemacht wurden: http://www.kirainet.com/english/canon-s90-or-iphone-4/ > Die Menge der Fotos von einer Kamera sagen sicher nichts über deren Qualität aus. Das […]
[…] ThreeD Advanced Handy Profi 1.040 Beiträge , Registriert seit: 03.03.2011 http://www.kirainet.com/english/canon-s90-or-iphone-4/ ich hab mir das mal vom np gemopst, ist ein geiler vergleich. […]